4.2 Article

Can Plasma Rich in Growth Factors Improve Healing in Patients Who Underwent Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer? A Split-Mouth Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 938-943

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000720

关键词

Oral cancer; radiotherapy; osteoradionecrosis; tooth extraction; PRGF; socket closure

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: The objective of this study was to identify surgical protocols that can improve mucosal healing and postextraction socket closure in patients who underwent radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. Methods: The study was designed as a prospective split-mouth trial on 20 patients who needed bilateral paired dental extractions. On the side directly impacted by radiation, chosen to be the study side, the sockets were filled with plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF), whereas, on the other side (control), they were allowed to undergo natural healing. Outcome variables were residual socket volume (RSV), healing index (HI), pain, and postsurgical complications as measured at the 2 sides at the 4 follow-up sessions (up to 30 days after the extraction). Continuous variables were analyzed with Wilcoxon (when matched) or Mann-Whitney (when independent) test; categorical variables, with Chi-squared or Fisher test. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Correlation was estimated with Pearson linear correlation coefficient. Results: The PRGF side showed statistically significant better values for RSV and HI at all checkups and no postoperative complications. The control side had a slower healing and 2 cases of bone exposure, which were successfully cured with PRGF application. The RSV on the 21st day after the extraction was correlated with the dose received but not with the time since radiotherapy. Conclusions: Plasma rich in growth factors proved to be effective in the management of patients with a history of head and neck radiotherapy, accelerating and fostering mucosal healing and avoiding postextraction bone exposures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据