4.5 Review

Influence of BSSO surgical technique on postoperative inferior alveolar nerve hypoesthesia: A systematic review of the literature

期刊

JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
卷 42, 期 6, 页码 976-982

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.01.019

关键词

Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy; BSSO; Chisels; Inferior alveolar nerve; Neurosensory disturbance; Nerve injury

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different splitting techniques, namely, mallet and chisel versus spreading and prying, used during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) on postoperative hypoesthesia outcomes. Study design: We systematically searched the PubMed and Cochrane databases (from January 1957 to November 2012) for studies that examined postoperative neurosensory disturbance (NSD) of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) after BSSO. Results: Our initial PubMed search identified 673 studies, of which, 14 met our inclusion criteria. From these 14 studies, 3 groups were defined: (1) no chisel use (4.1% NSD/site), (2) undefined chisel use (18.4% NSD/site), and (3) explicit chisel use along the buccal cortex (37.3% NSD/site). Conclusion: Study heterogeneity and a frequent lack of surgical detail impeded our ability to make precise comparisons between studies. However, the group of studies explicitly describing chisel use along the buccal cortex showed the highest incidence of NSD. Moreover, comparison of the study that did not use chisels with the 2 studies that explicitly described chisel use revealed a possible disadvantage of the mallet and chisel group (4.1% versus 37.3% NSD/site). These results suggest that chisel use increases NSD risk after BSSO. (c) 2014 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据