4.6 Article

Primordial black holes with an accurate QCD equation of state

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2018/08/041

关键词

primordial black holes; cosmological phase transitions; physics of the early universe

资金

  1. Royal Society University Research Fellowship
  2. Science and Technology Facilities Council [0000-0002-9307-437X, ST/L000504/1, ST/P000819/1]
  3. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/L000504/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. STFC [ST/L000504/1, ST/P000819/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Making use of definitive new lattice computations of the Standard Model thermodynamics during the quantum chromodynamic (QCD) phase transition, we calculate the enhancement in the mass distribution of primordial black holes (PBHs) due to the softening of the equation of state. We find that the enhancement peaks at approximately 0.7 M-circle dot, with the formation rate increasing by at least two orders of magnitude due to the softening of the equation of state at this time, with a range of approximately 0.3 M-circle dot < M < 1.4 M-circle dot at full width half-maximum. PBH formation is increased by a smaller amount for PBHs with masses spanning a large range, 10(-3) M-circle dot < M-PBH < 10(3) M-circle dot, which includes the masses of the BHs that LIGO detected. The most significant source of uncertainty in the number of PBHs formed is now due to unknowns in the formation process, rather than from the phase transition. A near scale-invariant density power spectrum tuned to generate a population with mass and merger rate consistent with that detected by LIGO should also produce a much larger energy density of PBHs with solar mass. The existence of BHs below the Chandresekhar mass limit would be a smoking gun for a primordial origin and they could arguably constitute a significant fraction of the cold dark matter density. They also pose a challenge to infiationary model building which seek to produce the LIGO BHs without overproducing lighter PBHs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据