4.6 Article

Visible sector inflation and the right thermal history in light of Planck data

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2013/07/019

关键词

inflation; supersymmetry and cosmology; cosmological perturbation theory

资金

  1. Lancaster-Manchester-Sheffield Consortium for Fundamental Physics under STFC grant [ST/J000418/1]
  2. STFC [ST/J501074]
  3. STFC [ST/J000418/1, ST/G00045X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/G00045X/1, ST/J000418/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inflation creates perturbations for the large scale structures in the universe, but it also dilutes everything. Therefore it is pertinent that the end of inflation must explain how to excite the Standard Model dof along with the dark matter. In this paper we will briefly discuss the role of visible sector inflaton candidates which are embedded within the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) and discuss their merit on how well they match the current data from the Planck. Since the inflaton carries the Standard Model charges their decay naturally produces all the relevant dof with no dark/hidden sector radiation and no isocurvature fluctuations. We will first discuss a single supersymmetric flat direction model of inflation and demonstrate what parameter space is allowed by the Planck and the LHC. We will also consider where the perturbations are created by another light field which decays after inflation, known as a curvaton. The late decay of the curvaton can create observable non-Gaussianity. In the end we will discuss the role of a spectator field whose origin may not lie within the visible sector physics, but its sheer presence during inflation can still create all the perturbations responsible for the large scale structures including possible non-Gaussianity, while the inflaton is embedded within the visible sector which creates all the relevant matter including dark matter, but no dark radiation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据