4.6 Article

Observer dependence of bubble nucleation and Schwinger pair production

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2012/12/006

关键词

inflation; initial conditions and eternal universe; physics of the early universe; cosmological phase transitions

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [PHY-0855447]
  2. JSPS [22540274, 21244033, 22244030]
  3. [19GS0219]
  4. [21111006]
  5. [AGAUR 2009-SGR-168]
  6. [MEC FPA 2010-20807-C02-02]
  7. [CPAN CSD2007-00042]
  8. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21111006, 22244030, 22540274] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pair production in a constant electric field is closely analogous to bubble nucleation in a false vacuum. The classical trajectories of the pairs are Lorentz invariant, but it appears that this invariance should be broken by the nucleation process. Here, use model detector, consisting of other particles interacting with the pairs, to investigate how pair production is seen by different Lorentzian observers. We focus on the idealized situation where a constant external electric field is present for an infinitely long time, and we consider the in-vacuum state for a charged scalar field that describes the nucleating pairs. The in-vacuum is defined in terms of modes which are positive frequency in the remote past. Even though the construction uses a particular reference frame and a gauge where the vector potential is time dependent, we show explicitly that the resulting quantum state is Lorentz invariant. We Own introduce a detector particle winch interacts with the nucleated pairs, and show that all Lorentzian observers will see the particles and antiparticles nucleating preferentially at rest in the detector's rest frame. Similar conclusions are expected to apply to bubble nucleation in a sufficiently long lived vacuum. We also comment on certain un-physical aspects of the Lorentz invariant in-vacuum, associated with the fact that it contains an infinite density of particles. This can be easily remedied by considering Lorentz breaking initial conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据