4.6 Article

Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity from large scale structure probes

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2011/08/033

关键词

power spectrum; high redshift galaxies; galaxy clusters; non-gaussianity

资金

  1. ASI [I/016/07/0 COFIS]
  2. ASI/INAF [I/072/09/0]
  3. MIUR
  4. ASI/AAE
  5. PRIN INAF
  6. ERC-StG
  7. Italian Space Agency [I/031/10/0]
  8. ERC-IDEAS [Phys.LSS 240117]
  9. MICINN [AYA2008-03531]
  10. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  11. National Science Foundation
  12. U.S. Department of Energy
  13. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  14. Japanese Monbukagakusho
  15. Max Planck Society
  16. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  17. ICREA Funding Source: Custom

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper we measure the angular power spectra C-l of three high-redshift large-scale structure probes: the radio sources from the NRAO VLA Sky Survey (NVSS), the quasar catalogue of Sloan Digital Sky Survey Release Six (SDSS DR6 QSOs) and the MegaZ-LRG (DR7), the final SDSS II Luminous Red Galaxy (LRG) photometric redshift survey. We perform a global analysis of the constraints on the amplitude of primordial non-Gaussianity from these angular power spectra, as well as from their cross-correlation power spectra with the cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature map. In particular, we include non-Gaussianity of the type arising from single-field slow roll, multifields, curvaton (local type), and those which effects on the halo clustering can be described by the equilateral template (related to higher-order derivative type non-Gaussianity) and by the enfolded template (related to modified initial state or higher-derivative interactions). When combining all data sets, we obtain limits of f(NL) = 48 +/- 20, f(NL) = 50 +/- 265 and f(NL) = 183 +/- 95 at 68% confidence level for local, equilateral and enfolded templates, respectively. Furthermore, we explore the constraint on the cubic correction g(NL)phi(3) on the bias of dark matter haloes and obtain a limit of -1.2 x 10(5) < g(NL) < 11.3 x 10(5) at 95% confidence level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据