4.8 Article

Penetration of normal, damaged and diseased skin - An in vitro study on dendritic core-multishell nanotransporters

期刊

JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
卷 185, 期 -, 页码 45-50

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.04.006

关键词

Dendritic core-multishell nanotransporters; Skin absorption; Nanotoxicology; Reconstructed human skin; Non-melanoma skin cancer; Peeling skin syndrome

资金

  1. German Ministry of Education and Research Nanoderm Project [13N9062]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [HE3119/9-1]
  3. ERA-Net for Research Programs on Rare Diseases E-Rare-2 [01GM1201, SFB1112, TP B03]
  4. Leibniz Graduate School of Molecular Biophysics
  5. German National Academic Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A growing intended or accidental exposure to nanoparticles asks for the elucidation of potential toxicity linked to the penetration of normal and lesional skin. We studied the skin penetration of dye-tagged dendritic core-multishell (CMS) nanotransporters and of Nile red loaded CMS nanotransporters using fluorescence microscopy. Normal and stripped human skin ex vivo as well as normal reconstructed human skin and in vitro skin disease models served as test platforms. Nile red was delivered rapidly into the viable epidermis and dermis of normal skin, whereas the highly flexible CMS nanotransporters remained solely in the stratum corneum after 6 h but penetrated into deeper skin layers after 24 h exposure. Fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy proved a stable dye-tag and revealed striking nanotransporter-skin interactions. The viable layers of stripped skin were penetrated more efficiently by dye-tagged CMS nanotransporters and the cargo compared to normal skin. Normal reconstructed human skin reflected the penetration of Nile red and CMS nanotransporters in human skin and both, the non-hyperkeratotic non-melanoma skin cancer and hyperkeratotic peeling skin disease models come along with altered absorption in the skin diseases. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据