4.8 Article

Conventional versus stealth lipid nanoparticles: Formulation and in vivo fate prediction through FRET monitoring

期刊

JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
卷 188, 期 -, 页码 1-8

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.05.042

关键词

Biodistribution; Fluorescence imaging; Nanomedicine; Encapsulation stability; Drug release

资金

  1. French National Research Agency (ANR, CALIF project) [ANR-08-NANO-006]
  2. French National Research Agency (ANR, ANR Blanc Program) [ANR-10-BLAN-706]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The determination of the nanocarrier fate in preclinical models is required before any translation from laboratory to clinical trials. Modern fluorescent imaging techniques have gained considerable advances becoming a powerful technology for non-invasive visualization in living subjects. Among them, Forster (fluorescence) resonance energy transfer (FRET) is a particular fluorescence imaging which involves energy transfer between 2 fluorophores in a distance-dependent manner. Considering this feature, the encapsulation of an acceptor/donor pair in lipid nanoparticles (LNEs: lipid nanoemulsions, LNCs: lipid nanocapsules) allowed the carrier integrity to be tracked. Accordingly, we used this FRET technique to evaluate the behavior of LNEs, conventional LNCs and newly designed stealth LNCs. After the development through a one-step (OS) PEGylation process of these stealth LNCs (OS LNCs), in vitro guest exchange dynamics and release kinetics were evaluated for both LNC formulations. We thereafter assessed in vivo biodistribution of all types of lipid nanoparticles. Results showed enhanced stability of encapsulation in OS LNCs in comparison to conventional LNCs. Additionally, the presence of the long PEG chains on the lipid nanoparticle surface altered the biodistribution pattern. Despite different release kinetic profiles, OS LNCs and LNEs showed extended blood circulation time associated with a good structure stability over several hours after intravenous injection. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据