4.8 Article

Hydrophobic blocks of PEG-conjugates play a significant role in the accelerated blood clearance (ABC) phenomenon

期刊

JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
卷 165, 期 3, 页码 183-190

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.11.016

关键词

Accelerated blood clearance (ABC) phenomenon; Poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG); Polymeric micelle; IgM binding; Hydrophilic-hydrophobic interface

资金

  1. Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) CREST program, Japan
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22300170] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Injections of poly(ethylene glycol)-modified liposomes (PEG-liposomes) cause rapid clearance of the second dose of PEG-liposomes. This phenomenon is known as the accelerated blood clearance (ABC) phenomenon. Previous studies have suggested that PEG-specific IgM(anti-PEG IgM) can play a major role in the ABC phenomenon. In our previous study, however, a PEG-shell-possessing polymeric micelle with hydrophilic inner core (PEG-P(Lys-DOTA-Gd) micelle) did not induce the ABC phenomenon nor the IgM responses, and exhibited no change in its plasma concentration in PEG-liposome-injected mice. In the present paper, we studied the ABC-phenomenon in more detail by comparing the behaviors between PEG-liposomes, PEG-P(Lys-DOTA-Gd) micelle, and hydrophobic-core-possessing PEG-PBLA micelles. We demonstrated that the PEG-PBLA micelle induced similar IgM responses as observed in PEG-liposome; however, the second dose of PEG-PBLA micelle exhibited no decreases in their plasma concentration, while the second dose of PEG-liposome did exhibit rapid clearances. Furthermore, we did not observe any PEG main chain specific IgM in PEG-liposome injected mice by sandwich ELISA which can measure more specific IgM to the PEG main chain theoretically. These results suggested that the induced IgM recognizes an interface between PEG chain and hydrophobic chain, rather than PEG main chain, and the anti-PEG IgM hypothesis should be re-evaluated. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据