4.8 Article

Systemic delivery of BH4 anti-apoptotic peptide using CPPs prevents cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injuries in vivo

期刊

JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
卷 156, 期 2, 页码 146-153

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.07.037

关键词

Anti-apoptotic peptide; Ischemia/reperfusion; Cell penetrating peptides; Cardioprotection; Systemic delivery; In vivo

资金

  1. CNRS
  2. FRM
  3. [ANR-08-GENOPAT-031]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is an obvious need to develop pharmacological strategies to protect the heart in patients suffering from acute myocardial infarction. Apoptosis was evidenced as a main contributor of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury. Our cardioprotective strategy was based on the use of four cell penetrating peptides (CPP: Tat, (RXR)4, Bpep and Pip2b) which were conjugated to the BH4-peptide, derived from the BH4 domain of the Bcl-xL anti-apoptotic protein. These CPP-BH4 conjugates were able to reduce staurosporine-induced apoptosis in primary cardiomyocytes in vitro. Although Pip2b-BH4 was more efficient in terms of cellular uptake, it was as efficient as Tat-BH4 for its anti-apoptotic activity. As required for potential therapeutic application their cardioprotective effects were evaluated in an in vivo mouse model of myocardial IR injury. Our results clearly show that a single low dose (1 mg/kg) injection of Tat-BH4 and Pip2b-BH4 administered intravenously 5 min before reperfusion was able to drastically reduce infarct size (similar to 47%) and to inhibit apoptosis (similar to 60%) in the left ventricle of treated mice. Importantly, these effects are not observed following the injection of CPP alone or scrambled version of BH4. This study evidences that the Pip2b CPP, designed for oligonucleotides translocation, as well as the widely used natural Tat CPP exhibit similar efficacy in vivo to deliver BH4 anti-apoptotic peptide to the reperfused myocardium and may thus become useful therapeutic tools to treat acute myocardial infarction in the clinical setting. (C) 2011 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据