4.8 Article

Dual-targeting daunorubicin liposomes improve the therapeutic efficacy of brain glioma in animals

期刊

JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
卷 141, 期 2, 页码 183-192

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.09.020

关键词

Dual-targeting; Daunorubicin liposomes modified with MAN and TF; Blood-brain barrier; Brain glioma-bearing rats; Survival

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 program) [2007CB935801]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [30772664]
  3. Education Ministry of China [20070001741]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chemotherapy for brain glioma has been of limited value due to the inability of transport of drug across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and poor penetration of drug into the tumor. For overcoming these hurdles, the dual-targeting daunorubicin liposomes were developed by conjugating with p-aminophenyl-alpha-D-mannopyranoside (MAN) and transferrin (TF) for transporting drug across the BBB and then targeting brain glioma. The dual-targeting effects were evaluated on the BBB model in vitro, C6 glioma cells in vitro, avascular C6 glioma tumor spheroids in vitro, and C6 glioma-bearing rats in vivo, respectively. After applying dual-targeting daunorubicin liposomes, the transport ratio across the BBB model was significantly increased up to 24.9%. The most significant uptake by C6 glioma was evidenced by flow cytometry and confocal microscope. The C6 glioma spheroid volume ratio was significantly lowered to 54.7%. The inhibitory rate to C6 glioma cells after crossing the BBB was significantly enhanced up to 64.0%. The median survival time of tumor bearing rats after administering dual-targeting daunorubicin liposomes (22 days) was significantly longer than that after giving free daunorubicin (17 days, P = 0.001) or other controls. In conclusion, the dual-targeting daunorubicin liposomes are able to improve the therapeutic efficacy of brain glioma in vitro and in animals. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据