4.8 Article

Local controlled release of VEGF and PDGF from a combined brushite-chitosan system enhances bone regeneration

期刊

JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
卷 143, 期 1, 页码 45-52

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.11.026

关键词

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF); Platelet derived growth factor (PDGF); Brushite; Chitosan; Bone regeneration

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology [MAT2008-02632/MAT]
  2. ACIISI
  3. FUNCIS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The two growth factors VEGF and PDGF are involved in the process of bone regeneration. For this reason, we developed a brushite-chitosan system which controls the release kinetics of incorporated VEGF and PDGF to enhance bone healing. PDGF (250 ng) was incorporated in the liquid phase. Alginate microsphere-encapsulated VEGF (350 ng) was pre-included in small cylindrical chitosan sponges. VEGF and PDGF release kinetics and tissue distribution were determined using iodinated (I-125) growth factor. In vivo, PDGF was more rapidly delivered from these systems implanted in rabbit femurs than VEGF. 80% of PDGF was released by the end of two weeks while only 70% of VEGF was delivered after a period of three weeks. Both GFs released from the brushite-chitosan constructs remained located around the implantation site (5 cm) with negligible systemic exposure. A PDGF bone peak concentration of approximately 5 ng/g was achieved on the 4th day. Thereafter, PDGF concentrations stayed higher than 2 ng/g during the first week. These scaffolds also provided a local VEGF bone concentration above 3 ng/g during a total of 4 weeks, with a peak concentration of 5.5 ng/g on the 7th day. The present work demonstrates that our brushite-chitosan system is capable of controlling the release rate and localization of both GFs within a bone defect. The effect on bone formation was considerably enhanced with PDGF loaded brushite-chitosan scaffolds as well as with the PDGF/VEGF combination. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据