4.8 Article

Sustained and efficient porphyrin generation in vivo using dendrimer conjugates of 5-ALA for photodynamic therapy

期刊

JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
卷 135, 期 2, 页码 136-143

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.01.002

关键词

Aminolaevulinic acid; ALA; Dendrimer; Nanoparticle; Photodynamic therapy; PDT

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [067062/Z/029/Z]
  2. BBSRC
  3. CONICET [PIP 02283, 05508/3]
  4. Science and Technology Argentine Agency [PICT 05-9042]
  5. BBSRC [BB/D011329/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/D011329/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of endogenous protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) after administration of 5-aminolaevulinic acid (ALA) has led to many applications in photodynamic therapy (PDT). However the efficacy of ALA-PDT is sub-optimal for thicker tumours and improved ALA delivery and therapeutic response are required. We have investigated the conjugation of ALA to a second-generation dxcendrimer for enhancing porphyrin synthesis in vitro and in vivo in a murine tumour model using systemic i.p. administration. In vitro, the dendrimer was more efficient than ALA for porphyrin synthesis at low concentrations in good correlation with higher cellular ALA dendrimer accumulation. In vivo, the porphyrin kinetics from ALA exhibited an early peak between 3 and 4 h in most tissues, whereas the dendrimer induced sustained porphyrin production for Over 24 h and basal values were not reached until 48 h after administration. Integrated porphyrin accumulation from the dendrimer and ALA, at equivalent molar ratios, was comparable showing that the majority of ALA residues were liberated from the dendrimer. The porphyrin kinetics appear to be governed by the rate of enzymatic cleavage of ALA from the dendrimer, which is consistent with in vitro results. ALA dendrimers may be useful for metronomic PDT, and Multiple low-dose ALA-PDT treatments. (c) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据