4.5 Article

Impacts of Governance Structure Strategies on the Performance of Construction Joint Ventures

期刊

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000619

关键词

Strategy; Organization; Joint ventures; Governance structure; Jointly managed JVs (JMJs); Separately managed JVs (SMJs)

资金

  1. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD) in China
  2. National Science Council of Taiwan [NSC 100-2628-E-002-013]
  3. Shimizu Visiting Professorship from Stanford University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the construction industry, construction joint ventures (CJVs) have become one of the major organizational forms utilized in large-scale projects. However, because of the complexity of CJVs, the management of CJVs is much more difficult than that of usual projects undertaken by a single construction firm. Ineffective management and cooperation in JVs usually lead to poor performance. This study aims to investigate the performance impacts of governance structure strategies. In particular, this paper addresses two issues by empirically examining (1) the relationships between governance structure fit and CJV performance, and (2) whether jointly managed JVs (JMJs) and separately managed JVs (SMJs) perform equally well while holding the same level of governance structure fit. First, it is confirmed that governance structure fit has significant positive impacts on CJV performance. Second, it is found that JMJs perform slightly better than SMJs, all else being equal. Strategy implications based on the empirical results are also proposed and discussed in this paper. This paper contributes to the construction management literature by providing empirical evidence on the importance of governance structure fit and on the relative performance impacts of JMJs and SMJs. The results may also help practitioners by providing the guidance for organizational governance choices in CJVs. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000619. (C) 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据