4.6 Article

Social Semantic Approach to Support Communication in AEC

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPUTING IN CIVIL ENGINEERING
卷 26, 期 1, 页码 90-104

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000130

关键词

Semantic web; Social web; Publish/subscribe systems; Communication in AEC; Information and knowledge management; Ontology; Information systems; Knowledge-based systems

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Communication systems in the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry face many challenges. This paper proposes construction information and knowledge portal (CIKP), an information and knowledge-management system that utilizes three technologies to address the challenges in information exchange and knowledge sharing. First, a semantic web that is unlike typical data-exchange standards because ontologies present human knowledge in a machine-interpretable manner. This provides for more linguistic-friendly representation of tacit/subjective knowledge, which increases the level of human-friendliness of communication systems. Second, a social web, which links people (instead of documents) to create communities of practice (CoPs) and allows people to share, reconfigure, and generate knowledge. Finally, publish/subscribe (pub/sub) systems, which provide for a push-pull scenario for information exchange. In the proposed system, any knowledge item (KI) (e.g., a document, website, and blog) will be represented (tagged) with a semantic vector that describes its contents. The developer of the KI can push (share) this to his or her social network. On the other end of the spectrum, system users can build semantic profiles for their areas of expertise and/or interests. The system can pull (find) the most relevant KIs and forward them to the user. The system can also link peers with similar or complementary interest to one another to establish virtual ad hoc teams. The system was evaluated through input from two focus groups. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000130. (C) 2012 American Society of Civil Engineers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据