4.4 Article

Simulation-based cheminformatic analysis of organelle-targeted molecules: lysosomotropic monobasic amines

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN
卷 22, 期 9, 页码 629-645

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10822-008-9194-7

关键词

cheminformatics; lysosomotropic; cellular pharmacokinetics; drug transport; small molecule permeability; subcellular localization; simulation; rational drug design

资金

  1. NIH [RO1GM078200, P20HG003890, R21CA104686]
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R21CA104686] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE [P20HG003890] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM078200] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cell-based molecular transport simulations are being developed to facilitate exploratory cheminformatic analysis of virtual libraries of small drug-like molecules. For this purpose, mathematical models of single cells are built from equations capturing the transport of small molecules across membranes. In turn, physicochemical properties of small molecules can be used as input to simulate intracellular drug distribution, through time. Here, with mathematical equations and biological parameters adjusted so as to mimic a leukocyte in the blood, simulations were performed to analyze steady state, relative accumulation of small molecules in lysosomes, mitochondria, and cytosol of this target cell, in the presence of a homogenous extracellular drug concentration. Similarly, with equations and parameters set to mimic an intestinal epithelial cell, simulations were also performed to analyze steady state, relative distribution and transcellular permeability in this non-target cell, in the presence of an apical-to-basolateral concentration gradient. With a test set of ninety-nine monobasic amines gathered from the scientific literature, simulation results helped analyze relationships between the chemical diversity of these molecules and their intracellular distributions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据