4.7 Article

Are upwind techniques in multi-phase flow models necessary?

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS
卷 230, 期 22, 页码 8304-8312

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2011.07.030

关键词

Two-phase flow; Galerkin finite element methods; Upwind schemes

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
  2. CLEAN
  3. Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two alternatives of primary variables are compared for two-phase flow in heterogeneous media by solving fully established benchmarks. The first combination utilizes pressure of the wetting fluid and saturation of the non-wetting fluid as primary variables, while the second employs capillary pressure of the wetting fluid and pressure of the non-wetting fluid. While the standard Galerkin finite element method (SGFEM) is known to fail in the physical reproduction of two-phase flow in heterogeneous media (unless employing a fully upwind correction), the second scheme with capillary pressure as a primary variable without applying an upwind technique produces correct physical fluid behaviour in heterogeneous media, as observed from experiments. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据