4.6 Article

Pathogenic Enteric Viruses and Microbial Indicators during Secondary Treatment of Municipal Wastewater

期刊

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 81, 期 18, 页码 6436-6445

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01218-15

关键词

-

资金

  1. Agriculture and Food Research Initiative - USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2011-6800-30395]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pathogenic enteric viruses are responsible for a wide range of infections in humans, with diverse symptoms. Raw and partially treated wastewaters are major sources of environmental contamination with enteric viruses. We monitored a municipal secondary wastewater treatment plant (New Orleans, LA) on a monthly basis for norovirus (NoV) GI and GII and enterovirus serotypes using multiplex reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) and microbial indicators of fecal contamination using standard plating methods. Densities of indicator bacteria (enterococci, fecal coliforms, and Escherichia coli) did not show monthly or seasonal patterns. Norovirus GII was more abundant than GI and, along with enterovirus serotypes, increased in influent during fall and spring. The highest NoV GI density in influent was in the fall, reaching an average of 4.0 log(10) genomic copies/100 ml. Norovirus GI removal (0.95 log(10)) was lower than that for GII, enterovirus serotypes, and male-specific coliphages (1.48 log(10)) or for indicator bacteria (4.36 log(10)), suggesting higher resistance of viruses to treatment. Male-specific coliphages correlated with NoV GII densities in influent and effluent (r = 0.48 and 0.76, respectively) and monthly removal, indicating that male-specific coliphages can be more reliable than indicator bacteria to monitor norovirus GII load and microbial removal. Dominant norovirus genotypes were classified into three GI genotypes (GI.1, GI.3, and GI.4) and four GII genotypes (GII.3, GII.4, GII.13, and GII.21), dominated by GI.1 and GII.4 strains. Some of the seasonal and temporal patterns we observed in the pathogenic enteric viruses were different from those of epidemiological observations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据