4.4 Article

Geometrical and Optical Benchmarking of Copper(II) Guanidine-Quinoline Complexes: Insights from TD-DFT and Many-Body Perturbation Theory (Part II)

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY
卷 35, 期 29, 页码 2146-2161

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.23740

关键词

copper; TD-DFT; many-body perturbation theory; ligand-to-metal charge-transfer; guanidine

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [FOR 1405]
  2. European Commission's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) [312579]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ground-and excited-state properties of copper(II) charge-transfer systems have been investigated starting from density-functional calculations with particular emphasis on the role of (i) the exchange and correlation functional, (ii) the basis set, (iii) solvent effects, and (iv) the treatment of dispersive interactions. Furthermore (v), the applicability of TD-DFT to excitations of copper(II) bis(chelate) charge-transfer systems is explored by performing many-body perturbation theory (GW1BSE), independent-particle approximation and Delta SCF calculations for a small model system that contains simple guanidine and imine groups. These results show that DFT and TD-DFT in particular in combination with hybrid functionals are well suited for the description of the structural and optical properties, respectively, of copper(II) bis(chelate) complexes. Furthermore, it is found an accurate theoretical geometrical description requires the use of dispersion correction with Becke-Johnson damping and triple-zeta basis sets while solvent effects are small. The hybrid functionals B3LYP and TPSSh yielded best performance. The optical description is best with B3LYP, whereby heavily mixed molecular transitions of MLCT and LLCT character are obtained which can be more easily understood using natural transition orbitals. An natural bond orbital analysis sheds light on the donor properties of the different donor functions and the intraguanidine stabilization during coordination to copper(I) and (II). (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据