4.4 Article

High-quality protein backbone reconstruction from alpha carbons using gaussian mixture models

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY
卷 34, 期 22, 页码 1881-1889

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.23330

关键词

protein structure modeling; protein backbone; coarse-grained model; webserver; multiscale protein modeling

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [G0900187-1]
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) [BB/J019240/1, BB/F023308/1]
  3. BBSRC through a Eurocores [BB/J010294/1]
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/J019240/1, BB/J010294/1, BB/F023308/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. BBSRC [BB/J010294/1, BB/J019240/1, BB/F023308/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coarse-grained protein structure models offer increased efficiency in structural modeling, but these must be coupled with fast and accurate methods to revert to a full-atom structure. Here, we present a novel algorithm to reconstruct mainchain models from C traces. This has been parameterized by fitting Gaussian mixture models (GMMs) to short backbone fragments centered on idealized peptide bonds. The method we have developed is statistically significantly more accurate than several competing methods, both in terms of RMSD values and dihedral angle differences. The method produced Ramachandran dihedral angle distributions that are closer to that observed in real proteins and better Phaser molecular replacement log-likelihood gains. Amino acid residue sidechain reconstruction accuracy using SCWRL4 was found to be statistically significantly correlated to backbone reconstruction accuracy. Finally, the PD2 method was found to produce significantly lower energy full-atom models using Rosetta which has implications for multiscale protein modeling using coarse-grained models. A webserver and C++ source code is freely available for noncommercial use from: http://www.sbg.bio.ic.ac.uk/phyre2/PD2_ca2main/. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据