4.4 Article

An accurate and efficient method to predict the electronic excitation energies of BODIPY fluorescent dyes

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY
卷 34, 期 7, 页码 566-575

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.23168

关键词

ELMNN; BODIPY; electronic excitation energy; EEEBPre

资金

  1. NSFC [20971020, 21003019]
  2. Doctoral Fund of Ministry of Education of China [20100043120006]
  3. Science and Technology Development Planning of Jilin Province [20100178, 20110364 20100114, 201201062]
  4. Postdoctoral Foundation of Northeast Normal University
  5. Postdoctoral Foundation of China [20100481041]
  6. Special Grade of the Postdoctoral Foundation of China [201104518]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, the extreme learning machine neural network (ELMNN) as a valid computing method has been proposed to predict the nonlinear optical property successfully (Wang et al., J. Comput. Chem. 2012, 33, 231). In this work, first, we follow this line of work to predict the electronic excitation energies using the ELMNN method. Significantly, the root mean square deviation of the predicted electronic excitation energies of 90 4,4-difluoro-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene (BODIPY) derivatives between the predicted and experimental values has been reduced to 0.13 eV. Second, four groups of molecule descriptors are considered when building the computing models. The results show that the quantum chemical descriptions have the closest intrinsic relation with the electronic excitation energy values. Finally, a user-friendly web server (EEEBPre: Prediction of electronic excitation energies for BODIPY dyes), which is freely accessible to public at the web site: http://202.198.129.218, has been built for prediction. This web server can return the predicted electronic excitation energy values of BODIPY dyes that are high consistent with the experimental values. We hope that this web server would be helpful to theoretical and experimental chemists in related research. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据