4.4 Article

DFT Calculations on the Electronic Structures of BiOX (X = F, Cl, Br, I) Photocatalysts With and Without Semicore Bi 5d States

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY
卷 30, 期 2, 页码 183-190

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.21055

关键词

density functional theory; bismuth oxyhalide; band structure; density of states; photocatalyst

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50730002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The electronic structures of BiOX (X = F, Cl, Bi-, I) photocalalysts have been calculated with and without Bi 5d states using the experimental lattice parameters, via the plane-wave pseudopotential method based oil density functional theory (DFT). BiOF exhibits a direct band gap of 3.22 or 3.12 eV corresponding to the adoption of Bi 5d states or not. The indirect band gaps of BiOCl, BiOBr, and BiOI are 2.80, 2.36, and 1.75 eV, respectively, if calculated with Bi 5d states, whereas the absence of Bi 5d states reduces them to 2.59, 2.13, and 1.53 eV successively. The Calculated gap characteristics and the falling trend of gap width with the increasing X atomic number agree with the experimental results, despite the common DFT underestimation of gap values. The shapes of valence-band tops and conduction-band bottoms are almost independent of the involvement of Bi 5d states. The indirect characteristic becomes more remarkable, and the conduction-band bottom flattens in the sequence of BiOCl, BiOBr, and BiOI. Both O 2p and X np (n = 2, 3, 4, and 5 for X = F, Cl, Br, and I, respectively) states dominate the valence hands, whereas Bi 6p states contribute the most to the Conduction hands. With the growing X atomic number, the localized X np states shift closer toward the valence-band tops, and the valence and conduction bandwidths evolve in opposite trends. Atomic and bond populations have also been explored to elucidate the atomic interactions, along with the spatial distribution of orbital density. (C) 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 30: 183-190, 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据