4.5 Article

Topological Signatures of Species Interactions in Metabolic Networks

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
卷 16, 期 2, 页码 191-200

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2008.06TT

关键词

biosynthetic support; host-parasite; metabolic networks; reverse ecology; seed set species interaction

资金

  1. NIH [GM28016]
  2. Morrison Institute for Population and Resource Studies
  3. James S. McDonnell Foundation 21st Century Collaborative Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The topology of metabolic networks can provide insight not only into the metabolic processes that occur within each species, but also into interactions between different species. Here, we introduce a novel pair-wise, topology-based measure of biosynthetic support, reflecting the extent to which the nutritional requirements of one species could be satisfied by the biosynthetic capacity of another. To evaluate the biosynthetic support for a given pair of species, we use a graph-based algorithm to identify the set of exogenously acquired compounds in the metabolic network of the first species, and calculate the fraction of this set that occurs in the metabolic network of the second species. Reconstructing the metabolic network of 569 bacterial species and several eukaryotes, and calculating the biosynthetic support score for all bacterial-eukaryotic pairs, we show that this measure indeed reflects host-parasite interactions and facilitates a successful prediction of such interactions on a large-scale. Integrating this method with phylogenetic analysis and calculating the biosynthetic support of ancestral species in the Firmicutes division ( as well as other bacterial divisions) further reveals a large-scale evolutionary trend of biosynthetic capacity loss in parasites. The inference of ecological features from genomic-based data presented here lays the foundations for an exciting reverse ecology framework for studying the complex web of interactions characterizing various ecosystems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据