4.7 Article

Comparative performance of exponential, implicit, and explicit integrators for stiff systems of ODEs

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2012.09.038

关键词

Exponential integrators; Krylov projections; EpiRK methods; Stiff systems; Large scale computing

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Offices of Advanced Scientific Computing Research, and Biological & Environmental Research through the U.C. Merced Center for Computational Biology [DE-FG02-04ER25625]
  2. National Science Foundation [1115978]
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1115978] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Division Of Mathematical Sciences [1115978] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exponential integrators have enjoyed a resurgence of interest in recent years, but there is still limited understanding of how their performance compares with that of state-of-the-art integrators, most notably the commonly used Newton-Krylov implicit methods. In this paper we present comparative performance analysis of Krylov-based exponential, implicit and explicit integrators on a suite of stiff test problems and demonstrate that exponential integrators have computational advantages compared to the other methods, particularly as problems become larger and more stiff. We argue that the faster convergence of the Krylov iteration within exponential integrators accounts for the main proportion of the computational savings that they provide and illustrate how the structure of these methods ensures such efficiency. In addition, we demonstrate the computational advantages of the newly introduced Tokman and Loffeld (2010) [17] exponential propagation Runge-Kutta (EpiRK) fifth-order methods. The detailed analysis of the performance of the methods that is presented provides guidelines for the construction and implementation of efficient exponential methods and the quantitative comparisons inform the selection of appropriate schemes for other problems. (C) 2012 Elsevier By. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据