4.6 Article

Bond Behavior of the ETS FRP Bar Shear-Strengthening Method

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES FOR CONSTRUCTION
卷 16, 期 5, 页码 529-539

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000280

关键词

ETS method; Strengthening; Direct shear; Experimental test; Parametric study; Bond force-slip relations; Analytical models; Development length

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Fonds Quebecois de la Research sur la Nature et les Technologies (FQRNT)
  3. Ministere des Transports du Quebec (MTQ)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The embedded through-section (ETS) technique was recently developed to avoid the debonding failure that occurs with other fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) strengthening techniques, such as the externally bonded (EB) and near-surface-mounted (NSM) methods. The method offers greater confinement and leads, therefore, to a substantial improvement in bond performance. In addition, it requires less concrete preparation than the EB strengthening technique. In this study, experimental results from 13 direct-shear test specimens are reported. The influence of the following major parameters on the bond behavior of FRP-strengthened reinforced concrete beams is examined: concrete strength, hole diameter, bar diameter, bar surface area, and bar bond length. The experimental results show that debonding can be avoided by providing a sufficient bar length and high concrete strength. Among the analytical models suggested in the literature for the bond behavior of FRP reinforced concrete, the Eligehausen, Popov, and Bertero (BPE) modified model and the Cosenza, Manfredi, and Realfonzo (CMR) model are compared with the experimental results obtained here. The CMR model with new fitting parameters is found to be an accurate way of simulating the experimental results. A new equation that accounts for concrete compressive strength and bar diameter is provided to estimate the development length. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000280. (C) 2012 American Society of Civil Engineers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据