4.6 Article

Bond Performance of GFRP Bars in Tension: Experimental Evaluation and Assessment of ACI 440 Guidelines

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES FOR CONSTRUCTION
卷 14, 期 6, 页码 659-668

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000139

关键词

Bonding; Development; Deflection; GFRP bars; Strength; Concrete; Slip

资金

  1. Lebanese National Council for Scientific Research
  2. University Research Board of the American University of Beirut (AUB)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development/splice strength and the pullout local bond stress-slip response of glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars in tension were experimentally investigated using beam specimens and pullout specimens, respectively. Two types of 12-mm (0.47-in.)-diameter GFRP bars were evaluated, namely, thread wrapped and ribbed. The test parameters included the concrete cover, the splice length, and the area of steel confinement for the beam specimens, and the concrete compressive strength for the pullout specimens. Companion steel reinforced beams were also tested for comparison. All beam specimens reinforced with thread-wrapped GFRP bars experienced pullout mode of bond failure, while all specimens reinforced with ribbed GFRP bars or steel bars experienced splitting mode of bond failure. It was found that the bond strength of FRP bars is largely dependent on the surface conditions of the bars. The pullout local bond stress-slip response of ribbed GFRP bars is intrinsically similar to that of steel bars reported in the literature. The bond strength of both types of GFRP bars investigated was about two to three times lower than that of steel bars. Predictions of the development/splice strength of GFRP bars in accordance with the ACI Committee 440 guidelines were unconservative in comparison with the test data. Also, in contradiction with the current ACI 440 report, the use of transverse confining reinforcement increased the bond strength by a sizable 15-30%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据