4.3 Article

Physiological flexibility in the Andean lizard Liolaemus bellii: seasonal changes in energy acquisition, storage and expenditure

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00360-008-0292-6

关键词

Annual cycles; Fat bodies; Gut; Metabolism; Phenotypic plasticity

资金

  1. FONDAP [1501-0001]
  2. University of Chile [DII05/02-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

According to the barrel model, an organism may be represented by a container, with input energy constraints (foraging, digestion, and absorption) symbolized by funnels connected in tandem, and energy outputs (maintenance, growth, and reproduction) symbolized by a series of spouts arranged in parallel. Animals can respond to changes in environmental conditions, through adjustments in the size of the funnels, the fluid stored inside the barrel, or the output flow through the spouts. In the present study, we investigate the interplay among these processes through the analysis of seasonal changes in organ size and metabolic rate in a lizard species (Liolaemus bellii) that inhabits extremely seasonal environments in the Andes range. We found that digestive organ size showed the greatest values during spring and summer, that is, during the foraging seasons. Energy reserves were larger during summer and autumn, and then decreased through winter and spring, which was correlated with overwintering maintenance and reproductive costs. Standard metabolic rate was greater during the high-activity seasons (spring and summer), but this increase was only noticeable at higher environmental temperatures. The ability of many lizard species to reduce their maintenance cost during the cold months of the year, beyond what is expected from temperature decrease, is probably related to their success in coping with highly fluctuating environments. Here, we demonstrate that this ability is correlated with high physiological flexibility, which allows animals to adjust energy acquisition, storing and expenditure processes according to current environmental conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据