4.5 Article

Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells are a Novel Source of Neural Progenitor Cells (iNPCs) that Migrate and Integrate in the Rodent Spinal Cord

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY
卷 522, 期 12, 页码 2707-2728

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cne.23578

关键词

Human iPS cells; neural progenitor cells; astrocytes; cell transplantation; regenerative therapy; ALS

资金

  1. Cedars-Sinai Institutional startup funds
  2. California Institute for Regenerative Medicine [RT-02040, DR2A-05320]
  3. National Institute of Health [5RC2NS069422-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transplantation of human neural progenitor cells (NPCs) into the brain or spinal cord to replace lost cells, modulate the injury environment, or create a permissive milieu to protect and regenerate host neurons is a promising therapeutic strategy for neurological diseases. Deriving NPCs from human fetal tissue is feasible, although problematic issues include limited sources and ethical concerns. Here we describe a new and abundant source of NPCs derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). A novel chopping technique was used to transform adherent iPSCs into free-floating spheres that were easy to maintain and were expandable (EZ spheres) (Ebert et al. [2013] Stem Cell Res 10: 417-427). These EZ spheres could be differentiated towards NPC spheres with a spinal cord phenotype using a combination of all-trans retinoic acid (RA) and epidermal growth factor (EGF) and fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) mitogens. Suspension cultures of NPCs derived from human iPSCs or fetal tissue have similar characteristics, although they were not similar when grown as adherent cells. In addition, iPSC-derived NPCs (iNPCs) survived grafting into the spinal cord of athymic nude rats with no signs of overgrowth and with a very similar profile to human fetal-derived NPCs (fNPCs). These results suggest that human iNPCs behave like fNPCs and could thus be a valuable alternative for cellular regenerative therapies of neurological diseases. (C) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据