4.5 Article

The Role of octopamine and tyramine in Drosophila larval locomotion

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY
卷 520, 期 16, 页码 3764-3785

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/cne.23152

关键词

Drosophila larva; locomotion; single cell analysis; octopamine; tyramine

资金

  1. Swiss National Funds [PBFRP3-133515, PBFRP3-133659, 31003A-105517, 31003A-132812]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [TH1584/1-1]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [31003A_132812, PBFRP3-133659, PBFRP3-133515] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The characteristic crawling behavior of Drosophila larvae consists of a series of rhythmic waves of peristalsis and episodes of head swinging and turning. The two biogenic amines octopamine and tyramine have recently been shown to modulate various parameters of locomotion, such as muscle contraction, the time spent in pausing or forward locomotion, and the initiation and maintenance of rhythmic motor patterns. By using mutants having altered octopamine and tyramine levels and by genetic interference with both systems we confirm that signaling of these two amines is necessary for larval locomotion. We show that a small set of about 40 octopaminergic/tyraminergic neurons within the ventral nerve cord is sufficient to trigger proper larval locomotion. Using single-cell clones, we describe the morphology of these neurons individually. Given various potential roles of octopamine and tyramine in the larval brain, such as locomotion, learning and memory, stress-induced behaviors or the regulation of the energy state, functions that are often not easy to discriminate, we dissect here for the first time a subset of this complex circuit that modulates specifically larval locomotion. Thus, these data will help to understandfor a given neuronal modulatorhow specific behavioral functions are executed within distinct subcircuits of a complex neuronal network. J. Comp. Neurol. 520:37643785, 2012. (C) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据