4.5 Article

Comparative Anatomy of the Locus Coeruleus in Humans and Nonhuman Primates

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY
卷 518, 期 7, 页码 963-971

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/cne.22249

关键词

locus coeruleus; nonhuman primates; hominids; tyrosine hydroxylase; stereology

资金

  1. James McDonnell's Foundation [22002078]
  2. NIH/NINDS [U54 NS39407, NS42867]
  3. National Science Foundation [BCS-0515484, BCS-0549117, BCS-0827531, DGE-0801634]
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [U54NS039407, R01NS042867] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The locus coeruleus (LC) is a dense cluster of neurons that projects axons throughout the neuroaxis and is located in the rostral pontine tegmentum extending from the level of the inferior colliculus to the motor nucleus of the trigeminal nerve. LC neurons are lost in the course of several neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases. In this study we used Nissl staining and tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) immunoreactivity to compare the human LC with that of closely related primate species, including great and lesser apes, and macaque monkeys. TH catalyzes the initial and rate-limiting step in catecholamine biosynthesis. The number of TH-immunoreactive (TH-ir) neurons was estimated in each species using stereologic methods. In the LC of humans the mean total number of TH-ir neurons was significantly higher compared to the other primates. Because the total number of TH-ir neurons in the LC was highly correlated with the species mean volume of the medulla oblongata, cerebellum, and neocortical gray matter, we conclude that much of the observed phylogenetic variation can be explained by anatomical scaling. Notably, the total number of LC neurons in humans was most closely predicted by the nonhuman allometric scaling relationship relative to medulla size, whereas the number of LC neurons in humans was considerably lower than predicted according to neocortex and cerebellum volume. J. Comp. Neurol. 518: 963-971,2010. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据