4.5 Article

Contralateral Projections of the Rat Anterior Olfactory Nucleus

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY
卷 512, 期 1, 页码 115-123

出版社

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/cne.21900

关键词

olfactory cortex; anatomy; olfaction; cortical processing

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  2. National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD) [NIH DC005577, NIH DC 000338]
  3. Sigma Xi Grant-in-Aid of Research
  4. Harrison Research Award from the University of Virginia.
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DEAFNESS AND OTHER COMMUNICATION DISORDERS [R03DC005557, R01DC000338] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The anterior olfactory nucleus (AON) is a central olfactory cortical structure that has heavy reciprocal connections with both the olfactory bulb (OB) and piriform cortex. While it has been firmly established that the ACIN is a primary source of bilateral projections in the olfactory system through extensive connections with both the ipsilateral and contralateral OB, AON, and piriform cortex, few studies have examined this circuitry in detail. In the present study we used small injections of the anterograde tracer Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin (PHA-L) and the retrograde tracer FluoroGold in specific subregions of the AON to explore the topography of the interconnections between the left and right AONs. Labeled fibers were found in the contralateral ACIN following injections in all areas. However, detailed quantitative analyses revealed that different regions of the AON have distinct patterns of interhemispheric innervation; contralateral fibers were most heavily targeted to dorsal and lateral AON subregions, while the medial and ventral areas received relatively light projections. These results demonstrate important features of the interhemispheric circuitry of the AON and suggest separate functional roles for subregions of the AON in olfactory information processing. J. Comp. Neurol. 512:115-123, 2009. (C) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据