4.5 Article

Cellular Expression of Midkine-a and Midkine-b during Retinal Development and Photoreceptor Regeneration in Zebrafish

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY
卷 514, 期 1, 页码 1-10

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cne.21999

关键词

mdka; mdkb; growth factors; development; regeneration; neurogenesis; zebrafish

资金

  1. NEI NIH HHS [P30-EY07003, P30 EY007003, R01-EY07060, R01 EY007060] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDCR NIH HHS [T32 DE007057, T32-DE07057] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [T32 NS076401] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the retina of adult teleosts, stem cells are sustained in two specialized niches: the ciliary marginal zone (CMZ) and the microenvironment surrounding adult Muller glia. Recently, Muller glia were identified as the regenerative stem cells in the teleost retina. Secreted signaling molecules that regulate neuronal regeneration in the retina are largely unknown. In a microarray screen to discover such factors, we identified midkine-b (mdkb). Midkine is a highly conserved heparin-binding growth factor with numerous biological functions. The zebrafish genome encodes two distinct midkine genes: mdka and mdkb. Here we describe the cellular expression of mdka and mdkb during retinal development and the initial, proliferative phase of photoreceptor regeneration. The results show that in the embryonic and larval retina mdka and mdkb are expressed in stem cells, retinal progenitors, and neurons in distinct patterns that suggest different functions for the two molecules. Following the selective death of photoreceptors in the adult, mdka and mdkb are coexpressed in horizontal cells and proliferating Muller glia and their neurogenic progeny. These data reveal that Mdka and Mdkb are signaling factors present in the retinal stem cell niches in both embryonic and mature retinas, and that their cellular expression is actively modulated during retinal development and regeneration. J. Comp. Neurol. 514: 1-10,2009. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据