4.5 Article

Spatial patterning of cholinergic amacrine cells in the mouse retina

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY
卷 508, 期 1, 页码 1-12

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/cne.21630

关键词

Voronoi domain; nearest neighbor; packing factor; effective radius; regularity index; starburst amacrine cell; Bax

资金

  1. NEI NIH HHS [R01 EY011087-09S1, R01 EY011087-08, R01 EY011087-07A1, R01 EY011087-09, R01 EY011087, EY-11087] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The two populations of cholinergic amacrine cells in the inner nuclear layer (INL) and the ganglion cell layer (GCL) differ in their spatial organization in the mouse retina, but the basis for this difference is not understood. The present investigation examined this issue in six strains of mice that differ in their number of cholinergic cells, addressing how the regularity, packing, and spacing of these cells varies as a function of strain, layer, and density. The number of cholinergic cells was lower in the GCL than in the INL in all six strains. The nearest neighbor and Voronoi domain regularity indexes as well as the packing factor were each consistently lower for the GCL. While these regularity indexes and the packing factor were largely stable across variation in density, the effective radius was inversely related to density for both the GCL and INL, being smaller and more variable in the GCL. Consequently, despite the lower densities in the GCL, neighboring cells were more likely to be positioned closer to one another than in the higher-density INL, thereby reducing regularity and packing. This difference in the spatial organization of cholinergic cells may be due to the cells in the GCL having been passively displaced by fascicles of optic axons and an expanding retinal vasculature during development. In support of this interpretation, we show such displacement of cholinergic somata relative to their dendritic stalks and a decline in packing efficiency and regularity during postnatal development that is more severe for the GCL. J. Comp. Neurol. 508:1-12, 2008. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据