4.5 Article

Differential projections from subfields in the lateral preoptic area to the lateral habenular complex of the rat

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY
卷 507, 期 4, 页码 1465-1478

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cne.21610

关键词

habenula; afferents; hypothalamus; efferents; cytoarchitecture; connections

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The lateral habenular complex (LHb) constitutes an important link in the dorsal diencephalic conduction system conveying information from limbic forebrain structures to regulatory midbrain nuclei. In line with the considerable number of biological functions in which the habenula is thought to be involved, a complex sulnuclear organization of the LHb has been suggested. However, the precise connectivity of habenular sulnuclei remains to be identified. We hypothesize that axons from the lateral preoptic area (LPOA) project to distinct subnuclei of the LHb. As a result of an unexpected heterogeneity within the LPOA, we first examined its subregional morphology. Based on the analysis of several coronal series of sections, seven subfields were identified within the LPOA. Retrograde tracing experiments revealed that neurons projecting to the LHb were concentrated in the dorsal, ventral, and ventromedial subfields of the rostral LPOA and in the caudal LPOA. Anterograde tracing experiments confirmed that all LPOA subfields containing retrogradely labelled cells project to the LHb. Neurons in rostral subfields of the LPOA target predominantly the lateral area of the LHb, whereas caudal LPOA fibers innervate the medial LHb. Afferent labelling is most prominent within the magnocellular sulnucleus in the LHbM, and only few fibers can be observed in the parvocellular subnucleus of the LHbM. The superior subnucleus of the LHbM and the oval subnucleus of the LHbL do not receive any fibers from the LPOA at all. This is the first comprehensive study so far to show that projections from LPOA subfields individually target sulnuclei in the lateral habenular complex.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据