4.7 Article

A nanocrystalline oxygen-deficient bismuth oxide as an efficient adsorbent for effective visible-light-driven photocatalytic performance toward organic pollutant degradation

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 531, 期 -, 页码 463-472

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.07.093

关键词

Bismuth oxides; Oxygen-deficient; Adsorption capacity; Visible-light-driven; Photocatalysis; Organic pollutants; Palladium loading

资金

  1. Xi'an Shiyou University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, a simple binary oxygen-deficient Bi2O4-x oxide was prepared, and its crystal structure, optical property, band structure and electronic structure were systematically investigated. Plane-wave-based density functional theory (DFT) calculations were also carried out to determine that Bi2O4-x is a typical indirect-gap semiconductor with the bandgap of 1.1 eV. Bi2O4-x adsorbed ca. 99% of rhodamine B and methyl orange, ca. 95% of methylene blue and ca. 80% of phenol in the dark within initial 30 min. The interaction of the oxygen-deficient structure-induced hydroxyls with pollutant molecules is responsible for the excellent adsorption capacity. Due to its excellent adsorption capacity, Bi2O4-x showed much higher photocatalytic degradation activity toward these pollutants (except for methylene blue) under visible light irradiation than the well-studied Bi2O4, Bi2O3 and P25, which had poor or negligible adsorption capacity toward the pollutants. Methylene blue was degraded by Bi2O4-x with further Pd loading. The photocatalytic mechanism of the oxygen-deficient Bi2O4-x were explored. The scavenging test results showed that direct h. oxidation contributes to the high photocatalytic activity of the oxygen-deficient Bi2O4-x,. This study highlights the potential of developing Bi2O4-x-based materials as a new class with both excellent adsorption capacity and highly efficient photocatalytic activity toward versatile pollutants. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据