4.7 Article

Exploring the impact of pore size distribution on the performance of carbon electrodes for capacitive deionization

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 430, 期 -, 页码 93-99

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2014.05.015

关键词

Capacitive deionization; Electrosorption; Electrode material porosity; Ion selectivity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Capacitive deionization (CDI) removes charged ions from aqueous solutions through entrapment in the electric double layer (EDL) when the porous electrodes are polarized. In this study, three types of activated carbon cloth (ACC) with different pore-size distributions were used to study the effect of pore characteristics on electrosorption during CDI. Removal of seven different monovalent ions was examined for each ACC in batch reactors under 5 different combinations of applied potential and ionic strength. Results show underlying sorption mechanisms in the meso- and micro-pores were different. Electrosorption in the mesopores is influenced by partially-distorted EDL caused by EDL overlapping. Sorption capacity increased with increasing applied potential or ionic strength as overlapping effects were reduced. In contrast, EDL in the microporous regions could be highly distorted resulting in enhanced sorption capacity, which cannot be adequately described using the classic EDL theories. Electrosorption density (i.e., sorption capacity normalized by pore volume) decreased as the mesoporosity-to-microporosity ratio increased. These results are in agreement with those obtained using mathematical modeling by other recent CDI studies. Charge efficiency values were between 20% and 40% and appear to be substantially influenced by Faradaic reactions and ion desorption from the electrode surfaces. These findings suggest that pore-size distribution of electrode materials, especially the meso/microporosity ratio, should be optimized for the removal of targeted ions by CDI and well characterized to conduct more precise CDI modeling. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据