4.7 Article

A comparative study on selective adsorption of metal ions using aminated adsorbents

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 395, 期 -, 页码 230-240

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2012.12.047

关键词

Mesoporous silica; MCM-41; Chitosan; Selectivity; Adsorption

资金

  1. Hong Kong Research Grant Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is well-known that chitosan consists of amino groups for the chelation of metal ions while NH2-MCM-41 has excellent adsorption selectivities for metals. This work compares both adsorption capacities and selectivities of chitosan and NH2-MCM-41. It has been found that chitosan has adsorption capacities of 1.76 mmol/g, 1.03 mmol/g and 1.30 mmol/g for Cu2+, Ni2+ and Zn2+ respectively whereas NH2-MCM-41 has adsorption capacity of 1.52 mmol/g, 0.8 mmol/g and 0.83 mmol/g for Cu2+, Ni2+ and Zn2+. The higher adsorption capacity in chitosan is attributed to its higher loading of amine groups. The single component adsorption isotherms were well-fitted using Freundlich model. The binary adsorptions of Cu2+-Zn2+ and Ni2+-Zn2+ systems showed similar adsorption selectivities for both adsorbents. However, chitosan has no preferential adsorption for Ni2+-Zn2+ system while NH2-MCM-41 has a good selectivity towards Zn2+. It is believed that the difference can be attributed to the heterogeneous surface of chitosan due to its organic nature. The multi-component adsorptions were best described by a multicomponent extended Freundlich model. Despite the surface functional group, this work indicates the importance of the adsorbent support on selective adsorption. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据