4.7 Article

Facile solvothermal synthesis of mesoporous manganese ferrite (MnFe2O4) microspheres as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 398, 期 -, 页码 185-192

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2013.01.067

关键词

Mesoporous manganese ferrite microspheres; Anode materials; Electrochemical properties; Li-ion batteries

资金

  1. Hundred Talents Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS)
  2. State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Complex Systems of China [MPCS-2011-D-14]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21031005, 51272252]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the synthesis and characterization of the mesoporous manganese ferrite (MnFe2O4) microspheres as anode materials for Li-ion batteries. MnFe2O4 microspheres were synthesized by a facile solvothermal method using Mn(CH3COO)(2) and FeCl3 as metal precursors in the presence of CH3COOK, CH3COOC2H5, and HOCH2CH2OH. The samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, nitrogen adsorption, thermal gravimetric, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, temperature programmed reduction, and temperature programmed oxidation. The synthesized mesoporous MnFe2O4 microspheres composed of nanoparticles (10-30 nm) were 100-500 nm in diameter and had surface areas between 60.2 and 86.8 m(2) g(-1), depending on the CH3COOK amounts added in the preparation. After calcined at 600 degrees C, MnFe2O4 was decomposed to Mn2O3 and Fe2O3 mixture. The mesoporous MnFe2O4 microspheres calcined at 400 degrees C showed a capacity of 712.2 mA h g(-1) at 0.2 C and 552.2 mA h g(-1) at 0.8 C after 50 cycles, and an average capacity fading rate of around 0.28%/cycle and 0.48%/cycle, much better than those of the samples without calcination and calcined at 600 degrees C. The work would be helpful in the fabrication of binary metal oxide anode materials for Li-ion batteries. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据