4.7 Article

Molecular dynamics computations of brine-CO2 interfacial tensions and brine-CO2-quartz contact angles and their effects on structural and residual trapping mechanisms in carbon geo-sequestration

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 386, 期 -, 页码 405-414

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2012.06.052

关键词

Molecular dynamics; CO2 contact angles; Carbon geo-sequestration; Structural trapping; Residual trapping; CO2 brine interfacial tension

资金

  1. Royal Society
  2. EPSRC
  3. EPSRC [EP/J003859/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/J003859/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the context of carbon geo-sequestration projects, brine-CO2 interfacial tension gamma and brine-CO2-rock surface water contact angles 0 directly impact structural and residual trapping capacities. While gamma is fairly well understood there is still large uncertainty associated with 0. We present here an investigation of gamma and 0 using a molecular approach based on molecular dynamics computer simulations. We consider a system consisting of CO2/water/NaCl and an alpha-quartz surface, covering a brine salinity range between 0 and 4 molal. The simulation models accurately reproduce the dependence of gamma on pressure below the CO2 saturation pressure at 300 K, and over predict gamma by similar to 20% at higher pressures. In addition, in agreement with experimental observations, the simulations predict that gamma increases slightly with temperature or salinity. We also demonstrate that for non-hydroxylated quartz surfaces, 0 strongly increases with pressure at subcritical and supercritical conditions. An increase in temperature significantly reduces the contact angle, especially at low-intermediate pressures (1-10 MPa), this effect is mitigated at higher pressures, 20 MPa. We also found that theta only weakly depends on salinity for the systems investigated in this work. 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据