4.7 Article

Pickering emulsions stabilized by self-assembled colloidal particles of copolymers of P(St-alt-MAn)-co-P(VM-alt-MAn)

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 351, 期 2, 页码 315-322

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2010.04.056

关键词

Amphiphilic copolymers; Self-assembly; Nanoparticles; Surface-active; Pickering emulsions

资金

  1. NSFC [20974041, 50673038]
  2. Key Laboratory of Molecular Engineering of Polymers, Ministry of Education of China, Fudan University
  3. Jiangnan University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new type of copolymer containing two alternating segments, poly-(styrene-alt-maleic anhydride)-co-poly (7-(4-vinylbenzyloxyl)-4-methylcoumarin-alt-maleic anhydride) P(St-alt-MAn)-co-P(VM-alt-MAn) (PSMVM), was prepared. The copolymer self-assembled into nanoparticles with internal microphase structures in water because the hydrophilicity of segment P(VM-alt-MAn) is higher than that of P(St-alt-MAn). The particle size, morphology, zeta potential and surface properties and their dependence on the pH and slat concentrations were studied with a combination of techniques. The nanoparticles of PSMVM showed surface activity and pH sensitivity for producing Pickering oil-in-water emulsions. The emulsion volume increased and the size of oil/water droplet decreased with increasing salt concentration. Furthermore, cross-linked nanoparticles (CLPs) were obtained by photo-dimerization of the pendent coumarin groups in PSMVM under UV irradiation. The emulsions produced by using the CLPs as emulsifiers showed even better stability upon standing. Solid oil-phase droplets were obtained by preparation of CLPs-stabilized Pickering emulsions with an oil phase of styrene containing the initiator AIBN followed by the polymerization of styrene. Thus, the enrichment and aggregation of the CLPs on the emulsion droplets was visible because the solid droplets remained unchanged during the SEM sample preparation. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据