4.7 Article

Hydrothermal preparation and photocatalytic activity of mesoporous Au-TiO2 nanocomposite microspheres

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 334, 期 1, 页码 58-64

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2009.03.034

关键词

TiO2; Au; Nanocomposite; Microspheres; Photocatalytic activity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50625208, 20773097, 20877061]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2007CB613302, 2009CB939704]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Au-TiO2 nanocomposite microspheres were prepared by hydrothermal treatment of precipitates of tetrabutyl titanate (Ti(OC4H9)(4)) in a mixed solution of water, ethanol and Au colloid particles at 180 degrees C for 7 h. The as-prepared products were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, nitrogen sorption, UV-visible diffuse reflectance spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and photoluminescence spectroscopy. The photocatalytic activity was evaluated by photocatalytic oxidation decomposition of formaldehyde in air. The results showed that the presence of nanosized Au particles slightly depressed the grain growth of anatase, resulting in smaller crystallite size and greater specific surface areas. Moreover, the absorbance and photoluminescence of anatase TiO2 was modified by those added Au nanoparticles and an appropriate Au amount in Au-TiO2 nanocomposite microspheres led to increase of band gap, decrease of photoluminescence intensity and prolongation of life of photo-generated electrons and holes. The photocatalytic activity of Au-TiO2 nanocomposite microspheres was obviously higher than that of pure TiO2 microspheres and Degussa P25. When the atomic percentage ratio of Au to Ti was below 0.00425, the apparent reaction rate constants increased. When the atomic percentage ratio of Au to Ti reached 0.00425, the sample displayed the highest photocatalytic activity. (c) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据