4.4 Article

Spaced Learning Enhances Subsequent Recognition Memory by Reducing Neural Repetition Suppression

期刊

JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE
卷 23, 期 7, 页码 1624-1633

出版社

MIT PRESS
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21532

关键词

-

资金

  1. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University
  2. National Science Foundation [BCS 0823624, BCS 0823495]
  3. National Institute of Health [HD057884-01A2]
  4. 111 Project of China [B07008]
  5. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie
  6. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci [0823495] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie
  8. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci [0823624] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spaced learning usually leads to better recognition memory as compared with massed learning, yet the underlying neural mechanisms remain elusive. One open question is whether the spacing effect is achieved by reducing neural repetition suppression. In this fMRI study, participants were scanned while intentionally memorizing 120 novel faces, half under the massed learning condition (i.e., four consecutive repetitions with jittered interstimulus interval) and the other half under the spaced learning condition (i.e., the four repetitions were interleaved). Recognition memory tests afterward revealed a significant spacing effect: Participants recognized more items learned under the spaced learning condition than under the massed learning condition. Successful face memory encoding was associated with stronger activation in the bilateral fusiform gyrus, which showed a significant repetition suppression effect modulated by subsequent memory status and spaced learning. Specifically, remembered faces showed smaller repetition suppression than forgotten faces under both learning conditions, and spaced learning significantly reduced repetition suppression. These results suggest that spaced learning enhances recognition memory by reducing neural repetition suppression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据