4.4 Article

Mirror neuron system differentially activated by facial expressions and social hand gestures: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study

期刊

JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE
卷 20, 期 10, 页码 1866-1877

出版社

MIT PRESS
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20127

关键词

-

资金

  1. Princeton University
  2. National Alliance for Autism Research (NAAR)
  3. American Association of University Women (AAUW)
  4. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci
  5. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [0830136] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Facial expressions and hand gestures are utilized in nonverbal communication to convey socially relevant information. One key process that mediates nonverbal communication is simulation. The mirror neuron system (MNS), which maps observed actions onto the motor representations used when producing those actions, likely plays a role in simulation. Previous neuroimaging experiments have identified a putative human MNS that includes the inferior parietal lobule (IPL) and the frontal operculum. Although understanding nonverbal communication presumably involves the MNS, it is unknown whether these two forms of nonverbal social communication have distinct representations within that system. Here we report the results of a functional magnetic resonance imaging experiment in which participants viewed, imitated, and produced facial expressions and social hand gestures. The observation and execution of facial expressions and social hand gestures activated the MNS, but the magnitude of response differed. Activation in the IPL was greater for social hand gestures, whereas activation in the frontal operculum was greater for viewing facial expressions. The locations of neural activity evoked by viewing facial expressions and social hand gestures in the frontal operculum were significantly different. These data argue that there are distinct representations of different types of social nonverbal communication in the MNS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据