4.6 Article

Multiplex loop-mediated isothermal amplification (M-LAMP) assay for the detection of influenza A/H1, A/H3 and influenza B can provide a specimen-to-result diagnosis in 40 min with single genome copy sensitivity

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY
卷 58, 期 1, 页码 127-131

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2013.06.006

关键词

Influenza; Rapid detection; LAMP

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Rapid isothermal amplification methods have recently been introduced and they offer significant advantages over PCR. Objective: To develop a rapid and sensitive M-LAMP assay for the detection of influenza A (H1 and H3) and B that does not require RNA extraction. Study design: We designed six primers targeting the matrix genes of influenza H1 and H3 and the NS1 gene of influenza B and developed a M-LAMP assay using a commercially available Master Mix and a real time fluorometer (Genie II, Optigene, UK) that displays real time amplification, time to positivity and amplicon annealing temperature (Tm). M-LAMP was evaluated against PCR by testing 202 nasopharyngeal (NP) specimens. Results: Optimized M-LAMP was rapid with a mean amplification time of 12 min (compared with 90-120 min for PCR), had an analytical sensitivity of 1 genome equivalent (ge), and could distinguish influenza A including subtypes A/H1 and A/H3 from influenza B by Tm. M-LAMP detected 26/28 influenza A/H1, 27/27 influenza A/H3 and 39/39 influenza B specimens and had a combined sensitivity and specificity for detecting influenza (A and B) of 97.9% (92/94) and 100% (108/108), respectively. The rapid amplification time of LAMP coupled with a novel 10-min specimen preparation procedure consisting of vortexing and heating in M-Swab diluent (Copan Italia) provided a rapid result. Conclusions: M-LAMP had excellent sensitivity and specificity for detecting influenza A and B in NP specimens and when used together with a rapid specimen processing method provided a specimen-to-result diagnosis in 30 min. (C) 2013 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据