4.6 Article

Chikungunya infection in Malaysia: Comparison with dengue infection in adults and predictors of persistent arthralgia

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY
卷 56, 期 2, 页码 141-145

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2012.10.019

关键词

Chikungunya virus; Dengue virus; Malaysia; Arthralgia; Rash; Differential diagnosis

类别

资金

  1. University Malaya [J-73565]
  2. European Union [261202]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) and dengue virus (DENV) co-circulate in areas endemic with the Aedes mosquito vectors. Both viruses cause similar illnesses which may be difficult to distinguish clinically. CHIKV is also associated with persistent arthralgia. Objectives: To compare and describe factors which differentiate between DENV and CHIKV infections on presentation; and to describe predictors of persistent arthralgia in CHIKV patients. Study design: Patients aged > 14 years diagnosed with acute CHIKV and DENV infections in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia were retrospectively identified. Clinical and laboratory data were obtained from medical records, and compared. CHIKV patients were telephoned 15-24 months later and interviewed about persistent symptoms. Logistic regression analysis was performed. Results: A total of 53 CHIKV and 113 DENV patients were included. CHIKV patients were older and more likely to be female. CHIKV was independently associated with arthralgia and rash, while DENV was associated with myalgia, raised aspartate transaminase, and leucopaenia. Forty CHIKV patients were followed up, with a median duration of self-reported arthralgia of 3 months (range, 0-24 months). Eighteen (45%) had persistent arthralgia beyond 4 months, for which age > 40 years was an independent predictor. At 1 year, 9 (22.5%) patients had arthralgia. Conclusion: In Kuala Lumpur, selected clinical and laboratory predictors help to distinguish between DENV and CHIKV infections. Persistent arthralgia was a frequent sequel of CHIKV infection in this cohort. (C) 2012 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据