4.6 Article

Hepatitis E virus excretion can be prolonged in patients with hematological malignancies

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY
卷 49, 期 2, 页码 141-144

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2010.06.016

关键词

Hepatitis E; Autochthonous hepatitis E; Hematological malignancies; Acute hepatitis; Chronic hepatitis

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is transmitted via the fecal-oral route and locally acquired sporadic hepatitis E can occur in Western countries. Chronic hepatitis E virus infections have been recently described in solid organ transplant recipients. There is little data on the evolution of hepatitis E in patients immunocompromised for other reasons. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical course of hepatitis E in patients immunocompromised because of hematological malignancies. Study design: Starting on November 2003, all patients in the Toulouse University Hospital Hematology Department with unexplained elevated transaminases were tested for hepatitis E using viral RNA detection in serum or stools and serology. Results: Acute hepatitis E was diagnosed in six middle-aged hematology patients. All cases were autochthonous. HEV strains were genotype 3. All patients had a significant increase of transaminases (6-95 upper limit normal) and only two had HEV IgG. Five patients were asymptomatic and one had jaundice. Transmission of HEV occurred between two patients who had overlapping stays in the hematology ward. All five evaluable patients ultimately cleared their HEV but viremia was prolonged over 6 months in three patients and specific treatment had to be postponed in two patients. Conclusion: Screening for HEV should be carried out routinely in hematology patients with elevated transaminases, and patient-to-patient transmission is a concern. Further studies are required to determine whether management of malignancy, particularly stem-cell transplantation should be adapted to HEV status. (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据