4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Recent progress on sanofi pasteur's dengue vaccine candidate

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY
卷 46, 期 -, 页码 S20-S24

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S1386-6532(09)70291-4

关键词

Tetravalent vaccine; Reactogenicity; Flavivirus immunity; Seroconversion

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The sanofi pasteur candidate dengue tetravalent vaccine (TV) is a recombinant live attenuated vaccine. It is based on a backbone of yellow fever vaccine (YF 17D) replication genes and incorporates the envelope genes of the four dengue virus serotypes. Pre-clinical studies have demonstrated that dengue TV is genetically stable, non-hepatotropic, less neurovirulent than YF 17D and does not infect mosquitoes by the oral route. Dengue TV reactogenicity, viraemia induction and antibody responses were investigated in three Phase 11 trials in the USA, the Philippines and Mexico. Participants were randomised to receive a three-dose regimen of dengue TV over 12 months (given at baseline, 3-4 and 12 months) or a control vaccine/placebo at baseline followed by two injections of dengue TV. Results showed that the majority of adverse events were mild to moderate and transient in nature, while no evidence of induction of viraemia was reported after initial dengue TV administration. Seroconversion was 100% for all four serotypes in flavivirus-naive adults in the USA injected with dengue TV. Similarly, seroconversion was 88-100% following three administrations in flavivirus-naive Mexican children aged 2-5 years. Furthermore, the proportion of seropositive subjects increased with each dengue TV injection in the Philippines where baseline flavivirus immunity was high (80.1%). An extensive clinical development programme for dengue TV is underway including an efficacy trial in Ratchaburi province, Thailand (an area of high dengue incidence). Assuming continued successful outcomes, initial submissions to regulatory authorities are envisaged within a 5-year period. (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据