4.6 Article

Complete genotyping of mucosal human papillomavirus using a restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis and an original typing algorithm

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY
卷 42, 期 1, 页码 13-21

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2007.11.021

关键词

HPV; genotyping; polymerase chain reaction (PCR); RFLP; cervical cancer

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Due to the differences in the oncogenic activity of human papillomaviruses (HPV), it is clinically important to accurately identify HPV types in a simple and time effective manner. Objectives: We aimed at developing a straightforward and cost-effective assay to individually identify all mucosal HPVs, based on the amplification of L1 gene using MY09/11 primers, and subsequent restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis. Study design: We made use of bioinformatic tools to analyze all published DNA sequences of 49 mucosal HPV types for PstI, HaeIII, DdeI and RsaI restriction sites. Based on the RFLP patterns, we have designed an original genotyping algorithm. Results: Each HPV type presented a distinct RFLP pattern, which was visually distinguishable on polyacrylamide gels. A set of 27 pre-selected patient samples of known HPV types was confirmed positive for the same HPV type using this RFLP assay. Furthermore, in a random and blind HPV typing experiment performed in 30 untyped clinical samples, RFLP data consistently matched DNA sequencing results. Conclusions: Our polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method, using 4 restriction enzymes (PstI, HaeIII, DdeI, RsaI) and an original genotyping algorithm, allows discrimination of all individual mucosal HPV types in single infections, and even detection of multiple infections. This assay gives complementary information to commercially available methods, and may also be financially advantageous, particularly when financial resources are scarce. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All fights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据