4.6 Article

WU and KI polyomavirus present in the respiratory tract of children, but not in immunocompetent adults

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY
卷 43, 期 3, 页码 330-333

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2008.08.003

关键词

KI polyomavirus; WU polyomavirus; Acute lower respiratory tract infection

类别

资金

  1. bioMerieux and the Basic Research Fund
  2. Institute of Pathogen Biology [20081PB113]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Recently, two new polyomaviruses (PyV), termed WUPyV and KlPyV, were identified in respiratory tract specimens from children with acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs). However, their roles in the disease have not been determined. Objectives: To determine the prevalence of WUPyV and KlPyV in the Chinese Population Suffering from ARTIs in Beijing, China, and to examine their possible role in causing disease. Study design: Nasopharyngeal aspirates, nasal swabs and throat swabs were collected from 415 children and 297 immunocompetent adults with lower ARTIs (LARTIs). The specimens were screened by polymerase chain reaction for the presence of WUPyV, KIPyV, and other common respiratory pathogens. Results: Although none of the adults Sampled were positive for either Virus, WUPy in 10 (2.4%) children and KIPyV was detected in 2 (0.5%)of the children sampled, respectively. Eleven of the positive cases were co-detected with either rhinovirus (6/11), respiratory syncytial virus (4/11), parainfluenzavirus virus (3/11) or Mycoplasma pneumoniae (2/11). Phylogenetic analysis of the WUPyV and KlPyV isolates showed that the nucleotide sequences were homologous to those of previously reported Strains. Conclusions: The presence of WUPyV and KlPyV in samples from children but not from immunocompetent adults Suffering from LARTIs Suggests that these viruses primarily infect the young population. Co-detection of additional respiratory pathogens in most of the specimens containing either WUPyV or KlPyV suggests that these viruses do not cause disease independently. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据