4.1 Article

Comparison of Treatment Response in Second-Episode Versus First-Episode Schizophrenia

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 33, 期 1, 页码 80-83

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e31827bfcc1

关键词

schizophrenia; relapse; nonresponse

资金

  1. Janssen-Cilag Medical Affairs Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA), a division of Janssen Pharmaceutica NV
  2. Janssen
  3. Lundbeck
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated whether illness progression and treatment refractoriness emerge after relapse in schizophrenia. We compared outcomes in a cohort treated with a standardized protocol for the first and second episodes of illness. The sample comprised 31 participants who (1) had successfully completed a 2-year open-label treatment phase with risperidone long-acting injection (RLAI) for a first episode of schizophrenia; (2) underwent an intermittent treatment extension phase up to 3 years or until recurrence, and (3) entered a further 2-year treatment phase with RLAI for a recurrence episode. For the patients who remained in treatment (n = 14 [45%]), Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale score reductions, response rates, remission rates, time to response, time to remission, functional outcome scores, and modal RLAI doses were similar for the 2 treatment periods. However, 17 (55 %) of the 31 patients discontinued the study in the second episode compared with 14 (28%) of 50 patients in the first episode, suggesting reduced effectiveness of antipsychotics when reintroduced after illness recurrence. Most notably, emergent treatment nonresponsiveness was observed in 5 participants (16%), consistent with the hypothesis that relapse may be biologically harmful in a subset of patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据